On Jan 19, 2008 11:11 PM, Christian Schoenebeck <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Samstag, 19. Januar 2008 18:43:44 schrieb Darren Landrum:
> > I seriously doubt Wikipedia would stand for that for long. It would be
> > best if someone could set up a wiki on the LinuxSampler site. I think
> > Sourceforge's hosting supports that. But yes, a wiki would be a good
> > platform for that.
>
> Really? I cannot imagine there's really a wikipedia policy against it.
> There
> are Wikipedia entries about the most irrelevant things in the world. Why
> shouldn't we be allowed to list our planned features there. It's
> informational content about the project, no? :)
>
> To be honest, I'm just a bit lazy to install a wiki just for gathering our
> ideas, we only need that wiki now for the planning stage of the new
> engine,
> not afterwards anymore.
>
> I couln't find anything about that on the SF project site btw. The only
> thing
> you can do is to anonymously upload documentation, but it still has to be
> verified by one of the project's admins before appearing on the site. So
> that's not a good solution.
>
An alternative to setting one up would be to create a free linuxsampler wiki
at pbwiki:
http://pbwiki.com
--
Anders Dahnielson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Linuxsampler-devel mailing list
Linuxsampler-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linuxsampler-devel
