Speaking just as a WG participant.
I would rather a document like this focus purely on the allocation
criteria that needs to be applied to:
1) An experimental EID block
2) ongoing LISP allocations beyond the life of the experimentGiven the expected (numbering) requirements of a LISP site. Simply, while it is temping to use the RIRs, and name them, it is not appropriate in my opinion to assign work to the RIRs. That is the job of their membership. Similarly, what policies the RIRs have now are all subject to change within their own policy development processes. Please don't re-codify them here. I would also prefer to see this document take the approach of defining what is best for LISP, not how can we use the RIRs as an allocation framework. The concern I have is that if LISP ends up requiring something very different to how the RIRs do it - we would be doing a disservice to both LISP and the RIRs by pushing it that way. The definition of terms is well stated elsewhere, perhaps you can point to those locations? Cheers Terry On 26/02/13 7:59 AM, "Luigi Iannone" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >FYI a new version is available. > > >Comments still welcome ;-) > > >L. > >Begin forwarded message: > > >From: >[email protected] > >Subject: >I-D Action: draft-iannone-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-01.txt > >Date: >25 February 2013 21:47:29 GMT+01:00 > >To: >[email protected] > >Reply-To: >[email protected] > > > >A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >directories. > > >Title : LISP EID Block Management Guidelines >Author(s) : Luigi Iannone > Roger Jorgensen >Filename : draft-iannone-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-01.txt >Pages : 9 >Date : 2013-02-25 > >Abstract: > This document proposes an allocation framework for the management of > the LISP EID address prefix (requested in a separate document). Such > framework relies on hierarchical distribution of the address space to > RIRs (Regional Internet Registries), who will allocate on a temporary > basis sub-prefixes to requesting organizations. > > >The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-iannone-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt > >There's also a htmlized version available at: >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-iannone-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-01 > >A diff from the previous version is available at: >http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-iannone-lisp-eid-block-mgmnt-01 > > >Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > >_______________________________________________ >I-D-Announce mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce >Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html >or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt > > > > > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
