<rir hat off> I think that going forward withou considering the RIR system would be a big mistake (by either ignoring them, or doing something without asking)
I haven't read the draft carefully (I will) but I think that if the authors' intention is to promote a dialogue, it is in good direction. </rir hat off> Regards, as On 28/02/2013 03:52, Roger Jørgensen wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]> wrote: >> That similar. My point is specifically to stay out fo "who" except for the >> root. > > excellent, think we can agree on that really, and that's one direction to > think. > > I would really like to hear if any other have other possible direction > we can consider, either with or without existing RIR system. > > > _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
