(Speaking personally, and interested in more data or perspectives.)
As far as I can tell, EID space is not Internet routable IPv6 Unicast space.
And the coordination requirements appear to me to be quite different
from those for IPv6 routable unicast addressing.
As are the constraints which drive allocation.
Which is why I want to spell out the requirements, rather than writing
in who will fill those requirements.
Yours,
Joel
On 3/2/2013 1:31 AM, Arturo Servin wrote:
Because the draft is about IPv6 unicast space. Currently that is
managed to the RIRs and IANA which seems to work well, not perfect.
So far, no body has given an alternative to manage that space besides a
collaboration among the RIRs as in this one.
If you have an alernative I would love to hear it, but not just say
that you do not want to go into the RIR system without a feasible
alternative.
Best regards,
as
P.D. Same as previus, rir hat off
On 01/03/2013 17:03, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
Could you please explain why you beieve it is important to consider the
RIRs? It is quite possible I am missing something.
As a participant, I believe I have said clearly that I prefer that we
spell out what our allocation / delegation / application behavioral
requiremens are, without specifying who would meet them.
My expectation is that this would result in something where there RIRs
could participate, and where non-RIRs could also participate withot
going through the RIRs.
Yours,
Joel
On 3/1/2013 8:55 AM, Arturo Servin wrote:
<rir hat off>
I think that going forward withou considering the RIR system would be a
big mistake (by either ignoring them, or doing something without asking)
I haven't read the draft carefully (I will) but I think that if the
authors' intention is to promote a dialogue, it is in good direction.
</rir hat off>
Regards,
as
On 28/02/2013 03:52, Roger Jørgensen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 8:44 PM, Joel M. Halpern
<[email protected]> wrote:
That similar. My point is specifically to stay out fo "who" except
for the
root.
excellent, think we can agree on that really, and that's one
direction to think.
I would really like to hear if any other have other possible direction
we can consider, either with or without existing RIR system.
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
_______________________________________________
lisp mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
