> It would be worth for the WG to consider dropping the scalability aspects, > focus on the overlay technology itself, and possibly move the work > on standard track.
Could we use different wording rather than “dropping the scalability aspects”. I know you mean to core routing table scalability items. But we don’t want to convey in the charter that for the various overlay use-cases LISP can provide that it won’t scale. That is “scale of the protocol” and “having the protocol solve the Internet scalability problem” are two different and orthongonal items. And I think LISP should continue to scale the Internet, it just should not be the only or main focus of what LISP can provide. Dino _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
