Hello, I am supporting the move to ST and focus to overlay technology in this case.
Damien Saucez On 25 Aug 2015, at 11:27, Lori Jakab <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8/25/15 12:07 PM, Luigi Iannone wrote: >> Folks, >> >> so far only Dino replied to this thread. Should we understand that people >> are not interested in moving LISP to ST? > > I very much support moving LISP to ST, sorry for the delay in replying. > > Regards, > -Lori > >> >> L. >> >> >>> On 10 Aug 2015, at 00:02, Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> As suggested by Terry Manderson during the last meeting, it is time for the >>> WG >>> to think to move away from the Internet Scalability issue and focus on the >>> core >>> protocol technology. >>> >>> LISP has its merits, concerning routing scalability, proved by experimental >>> work >>> documented in the various RFC and drafts that the WG has produced so far. >>> That work remains untouched. Yet, LISP provides advantages and benefits >>> in contexts for which it has not been originally designed. >>> >>> It would be worth for the WG to consider dropping the scalability aspects, >>> focus on the overlay technology itself, and possibly move the work >>> on standard track. >>> >>> If the WG decides to go that way, this will give the opportunity to re-work >>> the core set of RFCs defining LISP, avoiding any reference to scalability, >>> and possibly enhancing the documents with the experience gathered so far. >>> >>> Would be the WG in favour of such direction? >>> >>> Joel & Luigi >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lisp mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
