Support for ST and overlay focus. Alberto
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote: > Folks, > > so far only Dino replied to this thread. Should we understand that people > are not interested in moving LISP to ST? > > L. > > > > On 10 Aug 2015, at 00:02, Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > As suggested by Terry Manderson during the last meeting, it is time for > the WG > > to think to move away from the Internet Scalability issue and focus on > the core > > protocol technology. > > > > LISP has its merits, concerning routing scalability, proved by > experimental work > > documented in the various RFC and drafts that the WG has produced so far. > > That work remains untouched. Yet, LISP provides advantages and benefits > > in contexts for which it has not been originally designed. > > > > It would be worth for the WG to consider dropping the scalability > aspects, > > focus on the overlay technology itself, and possibly move the work > > on standard track. > > > > If the WG decides to go that way, this will give the opportunity to > re-work > > the core set of RFCs defining LISP, avoiding any reference to > scalability, > > and possibly enhancing the documents with the experience gathered so far. > > > > Would be the WG in favour of such direction? > > > > Joel & Luigi > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp >
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
