Folks, so far only Dino replied to this thread. Should we understand that people are not interested in moving LISP to ST?
L. > On 10 Aug 2015, at 00:02, Luigi Iannone <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > As suggested by Terry Manderson during the last meeting, it is time for the > WG > to think to move away from the Internet Scalability issue and focus on the > core > protocol technology. > > LISP has its merits, concerning routing scalability, proved by experimental > work > documented in the various RFC and drafts that the WG has produced so far. > That work remains untouched. Yet, LISP provides advantages and benefits > in contexts for which it has not been originally designed. > > It would be worth for the WG to consider dropping the scalability aspects, > focus on the overlay technology itself, and possibly move the work > on standard track. > > If the WG decides to go that way, this will give the opportunity to re-work > the core set of RFCs defining LISP, avoiding any reference to scalability, > and possibly enhancing the documents with the experience gathered so far. > > Would be the WG in favour of such direction? > > Joel & Luigi _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
