+1 Victor
> On Aug 13, 2015, at 4:40 PM, Florin Coras <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 > > Florin > >> On Aug 14, 2015, at 12:49 AM, Vina Ermagan (vermagan) <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Yes to extending the overlay model to support multiple data plane encap >> types. >> >> Vina >> >>> On 8/9/15 3:05 PM, "Luigi Iannone" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> LISP provides a rather complete and powerful control-plane, where >>> by means of LCAF, possibly any existing namespace can be mapped >>> on each other. >>> However, the data-plane is not as flexible. The current specifications >>> allow only IPv4 over IPv6 and vice versa. >>> >>> In order to create what Sharon Barakai defined ³map assisted overlays² >>> more work is needed. >>> >>> In this context the WG should also decide whether just an >>> extended/enhanced >>> data-plane is sufficient/needed. Or should the scope be slightly larger >>> and >>> allow as well to support multiple headers type? >>> Such header are not necessarily defined by the LISP WG >>> (e.g. VXLAN-GPE, GENEVE, GUE, etc.) >>> >>> Would the WG be interested in working in extending the LISP overlay model >>> in order to provide data-plane support for what the control plane already >>> allows? >>> And what should be the scope? >>> >>> Joel & Luigi >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> lisp mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lisp mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
