> > > In this context the WG should also decide whether just an > extended/enhanced > > data-plane is sufficient/needed. Or should the scope be slightly larger > and > > allow as well to support multiple headers type? > > Such header are not necessarily defined by the LISP WG > > (e.g. VXLAN-GPE, GENEVE, GUE, etc.) > > I think supporting multiple headers is the better option. > > I also think that multiple header support makes a lot of sense
Alberto
_______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
