+1 Florin
> On Aug 14, 2015, at 12:49 AM, Vina Ermagan (vermagan) <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Yes to extending the overlay model to support multiple data plane encap > types. > > Vina > > On 8/9/15 3:05 PM, "Luigi Iannone" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> LISP provides a rather complete and powerful control-plane, where >> by means of LCAF, possibly any existing namespace can be mapped >> on each other. >> However, the data-plane is not as flexible. The current specifications >> allow only IPv4 over IPv6 and vice versa. >> >> In order to create what Sharon Barakai defined ³map assisted overlays² >> more work is needed. >> >> In this context the WG should also decide whether just an >> extended/enhanced >> data-plane is sufficient/needed. Or should the scope be slightly larger >> and >> allow as well to support multiple headers type? >> Such header are not necessarily defined by the LISP WG >> (e.g. VXLAN-GPE, GENEVE, GUE, etc.) >> >> Would the WG be interested in working in extending the LISP overlay model >> in order to provide data-plane support for what the control plane already >> allows? >> And what should be the scope? >> >> Joel & Luigi >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lisp mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp > > _______________________________________________ > lisp mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp _______________________________________________ lisp mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lisp
