Don't be a twit, Ronald.
On Thu, 30 Jul 1998, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, you wrote:
>
> >Ronald, I assume from the wording you have chosen to aim my way in public
> >(stupid, moron, etc) that you are not interested in a technical
> >discussion of the issues you raised.
>
> What's to discuss?
>
> If you have a defense for that which I have already stated (here) appears
> to be indefensible, then post it and save your protestation of hurt feelings
> for another mailing list (or perhaps one of the support newsgroups).
>
> >The rationale for the "stupidity"
> >you have witnessed is actually pretty straightforward for someone with a
> >decent understanding of e-mail systems, and I trust that you will be able
> >to figure it out on your own.
>
> Congratulations. You are this this week's winner of the ``Content-Free
> Snippy Retort Award.''
>
> If and when you feel up to discussing the _substance_ of my prior posting,
> please do let us all know, won't you?
>
> In the meantime I'll go back to grappling with the problems that your soft-
> ware (and you site) is causing me.
>
> P.S. Why is it that you folks at lsoft have been unable to remove the
> long-bouncing addresses of subscribers to your mailing lists who have
> died and gone to heaven many months ago? Do you folks _enjoy_ wasting
> your bandwidth, and that of other people, by continuing to send to dead
> addresses for months on end? Or is that something else for which your
> excuse is ``pretty straightforward'' and which will come to me if I just
> sit and think about it on my own for awhile?
>
>
> -- Ron Guilmette, Roseville, California ---------- E-Scrub Technologies, Inc.
> -- Deadbolt(tm) Personal E-Mail Filter demo: http://www.e-scrub.com/deadbolt/
> -- Wpoison (web harvester poisoning) - demo: http://www.e-scrub.com/wpoison/
>
