Ken Hooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Feature-wise it is the best list server, period, and I would dearly love to
> have it back again if I had the money.
Sounds like you haven't looked at Majordomo2. Ok, it isn't out of alpha
testing yet, but it's very rich feature-wise and it's free.
> Even if the "probe failed" message
> made one site admin angry once. (And I don't care a jot whether Robert G.
> is abrasive or whether Eric T. is defensive, anybody who avoids this sw out
> of concern that it might possibly annoy some remote sysadmin is not too
> bright...)
Note that Ron who complained about a specific brokenness of Listserv
is not just "one site admin". Ron develops anti-spam software, and
his explanantion makes a lot of sense where he explained why this
brokenness of Listserv makes his task of developing good anti-spam
software much harder.
If this brokenness of Listserv will not be fixed within a reasonably
short timeframe, I would certainly say that this is a reason for
everyone who is opposed to spam should consider migrating away from
Listserv.
-- NB.
