At 4:32 PM -0400 6/26/2000, Rich Kulawiec wrote:

>No, you haven't.  What you've been told is that opt-out == spamming, which
>is correct--but you've refused to accept this.  And because you don't
>accept this very simple and very obvious point,

because it's not true. And since some people on this list have this 
basic mis-assumption and refuse to discuss any possibility that it 
might not be true in some cases, we simply have nothing further to 
discuss about the issue, since I refuse to continue to be a target, 
and you continue to insist on nothing more than that we discuss this 
until you change my mind. There's no room for compromise on either 
side, so why bother?

Show me the RFC that says it's spamming, and I'll look at it. Until 
you can show me the standard that says this, it's nothing more than 
your opinion, and I'm tired of being bludgeoned by it. I'm happy to 
discuss the issue. You're ont discussing. You're lecturing.

-- 
Chuq Von Rospach - Plaidworks Consulting (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
Apple Mail List Gnome (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])

And they sit at the bar and put bread in my jar
and say 'Man, what are you doing here?'"

Reply via email to