At 10:23 AM -0400 10/25/00, Jim Trigg wrote: > >That's true. The problem is that you seem to be advocating making >the new feature the *only* way to identify the list that the message >came by. no, not only. Perhaps official is the better term. Of course, if you have a better way of doing it, we're all ears... -- Chuq Von Rospach - Plaidworks Consulting (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Apple Mail List Gnome (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Be just, and fear not.
- Re: elist address or your address in message TO header Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: elist address or your address in message TO head... James M Galvin
- Re: elist address or your address in message TO ... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: elist address or your address in message... James M Galvin
- Re: elist address or your address in mes... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: elist address or your address i... James M Galvin
- Re: elist address or your address in mes... Mike Avery
- Re: elist address or your address in message... Jim Trigg
- Re: elist address or your address in mes... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: elist address or your address i... Jim Trigg
- Re: elist address or your addre... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: elist address or your addre... Bernie Cosell
- Re: elist address or your addre... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: elist address or your addre... Bernie Cosell
- Re: elist address or your addre... John R Levine
- Re: elist address or your addre... David W. Tamkin
- Re: elist address or your addre... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: elist address or your addre... Tim Pierce
- Re: elist address or your addre... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: elist address or your addre... Tim Pierce
- Re: elist address or your addre... David W. Tamkin
