At 6:33 PM -0400 10/26/00, Tim Pierce wrote: > > It allows filtering, but not replying, a key issue with discussion >> lists. > >Have any of the proponents of to-header munging considered how >replies to the list will be handled? Are you going to move the >list's address to the Cc: header or something? That's why I suggested adding the concept of "reply to list" to "reply" and "reply all". Without that, and the associated header to support it, there really *isn't* a good answer that doesn't create some sort of problem in return. -- Chuq Von Rospach - Plaidworks Consulting (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Apple Mail List Gnome (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Be just, and fear not.
- Re: elist address or your address in m... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: elist address or your address... Jim Trigg
- Re: elist address or your add... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: elist address or your add... Bernie Cosell
- Re: elist address or your add... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: elist address or your add... Bernie Cosell
- Re: elist address or your add... John R Levine
- Re: elist address or your add... David W. Tamkin
- Re: elist address or your add... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: elist address or your add... Tim Pierce
- Re: elist address or your add... Chuq Von Rospach
- Re: elist address or your add... Tim Pierce
- Re: elist address or your add... David W. Tamkin
- Re: elist address or your add... Aaron Schrab
- Re: elist address or your add... Paul Hoffman / IMC
- Re: elist address or your add... Chuq Von Rospach
- PINE Filtering /& Subj... Paul K-
- Re: elist address or your address in message TO header SRE
- Re: elist address or your address in message TO he... James M Galvin
- Re: elist address or your address in message T... Russ Allbery
- Re: elist address or your address in message TO he... Chuq Von Rospach
