Ferg,
After reading this posting, I was wondering if you
have thourgh about this from the search engine
submission procures with regards to developing your CF
software program?
When any type of website is completed and
sub-mitted to the 20 major search engines
(google,-yahoo,etc.) where each individual inhouse
search engine dept. will review that website content
using their own inhouse standards, ranging anywhere
from 15 to 30 checkpoint standards (sex,violence,etc.)
are used to establish this coding. Think of this
webcoding as an movie rating system currently used at
the movies.
Based upon this inhouse process, then several
coding # are assigned and attached within that
particular website identify tags and other related
taging areas. At this point, that particular website
is then hosted and "goes live". Pleae bear in mind
that it takes anywhere between 4 to 6 months for any
newly released website to generate any desent public
traffic to that particular website.
Sorry for the length backgroud, but I wanted to
be sure that you were aware of the frontend coding
process already in usage. When designing this CF
content scanning idea, couldn't someone design the
program to fit within the allready existing pipeline
submitting process? This program could be either an
software or server side application uage. I have also
noted some additional features that you might want to
include also;
Develop an unified set of standards for reviewing and
coding each website content within the US market only.
Develop an unified set of in house enforcement polices
and procedures with regards to denial of access or
services within the US market only.
Develop an unified set of "key words or phrases" in
various languages for standards practices within the
US market only.
Develop an unified set of "picture or video actions"
in various languages for standards practices within
the US market only.
Their are currently several companies that are
development this type of software packages, an few
will be available by next summer according to several
net/web postings. I have even hear that an beta
verious is currently being tested from India of all
places, go figure.
joe
--- Ken Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd honestly like to hear peoples' ideas on the
> value of the type of
> application in question and how they'd go about
> building it. Now, if
> anyone has any comments on that subject, I'd really
> like to hear about
> them. If you're not personally interested in that
> topic, feel very free
> to wait for a thread in which you are interested.
>
> If you would have taken just a couple of seconds to
> read the rest of
> both of my last posts, I've attempted to reply to
> people and then pull
> the topic back on course by speculating on something
> that could be built
> (in cf???) to accomplish a goal.
>
> Oh, by the way, your post that touched off this
> exchange -- very
> ColdFusion specific. Way to demonstrate your stated
> preferences there
> Jack, strong work indeed.
>
> --Ferg
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jack Lavender
> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 1:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: The latest news from The Planet
>
> There was nothing poorly thought out or uneducated
> in my comment.
>
> I would prefer that this list be Coldfusion
> specifics, but you were the
> one
> who deigned the list could be used to tell us what
> you think thePlanet
> should do and how you feel about the whole thing.
> Then we get the
> retoric
> about it having nothing to do with freedom speech
> punctuated with
> your "personal" views on how a business should
> handle it. I would
> suppose
> that thePlanet is doing business per their rules and
> just like every
> business in this country they will follow the state
> and federal laws.
>
> jack
>
>
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:47:55 -0600, Ken Ferguson
> wrote
> > It has nothing at all to do with freedom of
> speech. It has to do with
> > whether a company wants to do business with the
> speaker. Also,
> > nowhere in any sane person's mind does the right
> to freedom of
> > speech extend to inciting violence. I hate the
> poorly thought out,
> > uneducated snapback of "they have the right to say
> it; who are you
> > to stop them?" Well, if I'm a hosting company, I'm
> the one who owns
> > the servers and that's who I am to stop them. I
> might not want that
> > on my machines or bandwidth. I might not want my
> business hurt by
> > the negative attention and publicity. I might not
> want my customers
> > calling up threatening to go elsewhere because I
> allow that type of
> > thing to reside on my network.
> >
> > Now, to put this back on the topic of CF, does
> anyone have any real
> > ideas on how best to go about building such an
> application, building
> > a sort of indexing engine like this? We've all
> built search engines
> > for sites we've done through database full-text
> indexing or Verity
> > or whatever, but has anyone done a wide search
> application tasked
> > with indexing whole networks of sites. Maybe it's
> something that's
> > got to be done with something like the Google
> appliance or some
> > such. Any thoughts, ideas...?
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of Jack Lavender
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 10:50 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: The latest news from The Planet
> >
> > Hmmmm, much agree "objectionable material" can be
> dangerous. Perhaps
> > you
> > should help the world out and make something
> happen. I am sure your
> > view on
> > freedom of speech will make the world much safer.
> >
> > jackal
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf
> > Of Ken Ferguson
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2004 12:00 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: The latest news from The Planet
> >
> > My idea though, is a simple application that a
> host could use to scan
> > their own networks for objectionable material.
> Then hosts like The
> > Planet couldn't say it's too difficult or too
> expensive to police the
> > content on all of our customers' sites...
> >
> > --Ferg
> >
> >
>
----------------------------------------------------------
> > To post, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To unsubscribe:
> >
> http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberUnsubscribe.cfm
> > To subscribe:
> >
> http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberRegistration.cfm
> >
> >
>
----------------------------------------------------------
> > To post, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To unsubscribe:
> >
> http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberUnsubscribe.cfm
> > To subscribe:
> >
> http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberRegistration.cfm
>
>
> Jack K Lavender Jr.
> Lavender Consulting
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 214.773-6143
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------
> To post, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe:
> http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberUnsubscribe.cfm
> To subscribe:
>
> http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberRegistration.cfm
>
>
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------
> To post, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe:
> http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberUnsubscribe.cfm
> To subscribe:
>
> http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberRegistration.cfm
>
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today!
http://my.yahoo.com
----------------------------------------------------------
To post, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe:
http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberUnsubscribe.cfm
To subscribe:
http://www.dfwcfug.org/form_MemberRegistration.cfm
