>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
But both Cars and Transformers are fantasy movies.  I don't know about you
but I have yet to see a world populated by living cars or transforming
  


That has nothing to do with it when they go out of their way to make it realistic (live action Transformers).  Yes, "Cars" is a fantasy world.  But why is everything else that is supposed to be solid (wood, concrete, metal poles) still solid but not the cars?  For the cheap lazy way out.  So that they can make the cars have exaggerated facial expressions because they have no confidence in their ability to emote any other way.
>>>>>>>>>>>>

For that matter fish, toys, bugs, etc. shouldn't have had the range of facial expressions, the ability to vocalize, etc. that they did in the other Pixar movies.  Cars is a cartoonish world, not a real one.  But I understand your POV as well.


>>>>>>>>>>>
Not if they base their characters in the real world.  If, as in Transformers, the premise is that these are modified metal cars and trucks and planes then they have to follow the real world physics of metals and plastics.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
 
Not if they are made of some otherworldly element.  The moveable parts could be nanotechnology or liquid metal ala T2.  .

Reply via email to