Dave Crocker wrote: > NSI is the problem, in this case, not the trademark community, because NSI > is choosing to give the extra rights to trademark holders. Huh? So Gabe Battista just woke up one day and said, "by golly, I LIKE trademarks! Think I'll give them bigger and stronger rights!" No, as a veteran despiser of the NSI drp, I can say that it was purely a defensive tack on their part, albeit a boneheaded and unfair one. Lawsuits from trademark holders pushed them into it. NSI did not "choose to give extra rights to trademark holders." It chose to defend itself from aggressive legal assaults from trademark holders by coming up with a mechanical and inexpensive version of trademark law. NSI's drp is to trademark rights what Eliza is to AI. --MM
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Michael Sondow
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Milton Mueller
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Martin B. Schwimmer
- No drastic changes in DNS needed? (was Re: [i... Carl Oppedahl
- RE: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats cgomes
- RE: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Bill Lovell
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Michael Sondow
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Dave Crocker
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats William X. Walsh
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Dave Crocker
- NSI favoring trademark owners? (was Re: [... Milton Mueller
- NSI favoring trademark owners? (was R... Carl Oppedahl
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Bill Lovell
- History of NSI's flawed policy (was Re: [... Carl Oppedahl
- Re: History of NSI's flawed policy (w... Milton Mueller
- Re[2]: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats FREDERIC WILF
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Clare Wardle
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Ellen Rony
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Michael Sondow
