[EMAIL PROTECTED] a �crit: > > Milton, > > The numbers provided reflect the number of times the policy > was invoked which includes times when the name was not > suspended. Thanks for clarifying this, Chuck. I, for one, took them in this sense. > The numbers do show a tapering off in the times > we have invoked the policy. Again, thanks for providing this interesting information and for your frankness and willingness to discuss it.
- ...it would be better if the... Bob Allisat
- NSI's definition of cybersquatting (was R... Carl Oppedahl
- RE: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Mikki Barry
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Michael Sondow
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Milton Mueller
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Martin B. Schwimmer
- No drastic changes in DNS needed? (was Re: [i... Carl Oppedahl
- RE: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats cgomes
- RE: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Bill Lovell
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Michael Sondow
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Dave Crocker
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats William X. Walsh
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Dave Crocker
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Milton Mueller
- NSI favoring trademark owners? (was R... Carl Oppedahl
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Bill Lovell
- History of NSI's flawed policy (was Re: [... Carl Oppedahl
- Re: History of NSI's flawed policy (w... Milton Mueller
- Re[2]: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats FREDERIC WILF
- Re: [ifwp] NSI Domain Name Dispute Stats Clare Wardle
