Jim Dixon a �crit:
> I have to disagree. If the current board is told that they should
> simply replace themselves and resign, what makes you think that their
> replacements would be any better?
>
> Look at things from the point of view of candidate replacement board
> members. Anyone signing up will know, if they have a modicum of sense,
> that they are being asked to fill seats judged by their previous
> occupants to be uncomfortably hot. I think that it was difficult
> enough to recruit the current board. This suggests that the replacement
> board would be markedly worse than the current board.
>
> The only way forward for ICANN is for the current board to get their
> act together. If they can't, ICANN should be allowed to go the way of
> all lost causes, and we should put our energies into figuring out some
> other way of handling its responsibilities.
>
> I am not advocating abandoning ICANN. I do think that some people
> should be putting some energy into working quietly on alternative
> approaches. Most of us should be trying to make ICANN work, for
> example by urging them to open up their proceedings and castigating
> them for hiring PR agencies instead.
This seems to be the most reasonable approach.
