Diane Cabell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I agree that membership will not likely attract the world population en >mass. But every reference to "the lists" as being the only voice >ignores people who do not use these lists or the English language as >their primary form of communication. It overlooks people who do not rely >on the lists as a way to communicate their wishes, e.g., people who >simply call a Congressman/MP/Deputy/ICANN. Out of curiosity, what types of concerns are raised by people who don't use the lists (or newsgroups, etc), and is there a way to make these concerns a part of the public record? --gregbo
- Re: [Membership] The People's R... William X. Walsh
- Re: [Membership] The People's R... Bill Lovell
- Re: [Membership] The People's R... William X. Walsh
- Re: [Membership] The People's R... Michael Sondow
- Re: [Membership] The People's R... William X. Walsh
- Re: [Membership] The People's R... Bill Lovell
- Re: [Membership] The People's R... Greg Skinner
- Re: [Membership] The People's Repub... Bob Allisat
- Look at the known facts, not th... Eric Weisberg
- Re: Look at the known facts, no... Diane Cabell
- Re: Look at the known facts, no... Greg Skinner
- Re: Look at the known facts, no... Bill Lovell
- Re: Look at the known facts, no... Diane Cabell
- Re: Look at the known facts, no... Bob Allisat
- Look at the known facts, not FC... Eric Weisberg
- RE: Look at the known facts, no... William X. Walsh
- list RE: Look at the known fact... Bob Allisat
- list Membership? ICANN? Not int... Bob Allisat
- Re: [Membership] The People's Republic o... Michael Sondow
- Re: [Membership] The People's Republic of ICANN? Michael Sondow
- Re: [Membership] The People's Republic of ICANN? Michael Sondow
