jeff Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Gordon Cook makes a good point that has been made over and over again >Mike. What is the essence of the ICANN's authority? It is not even >completely constituted yet. ICANN derives its authority from the NTIA, under the DoC, etc. So what is the US government position on the tax that ICANN proposes to levy, and the purposes that this tax puports to fulfill? What are other governments' positions on this tax? It seems given the scope of this tax, it needs to have quite a bit more public evaluation than it's currently getting. --gregbo
- Re: ICANN's Defective Competition Guidelines, etc (was Ac... William X. Walsh
- Re: ICANN's Defective Competition Guidelines, etc (w... Gordon Cook
- Re: ICANN's Defective Competition Guidelines, et... jeff Williams
- Re: ICANN's Defective Competition Guidelines... Greg Skinner
- Re: ICANN's Defective Competition Guidel... jeff Williams
- Re: ICANN's Defective Competition Guidelines, etc (w... jeff Williams
- Re: ICANN's Defective Competition Guidelines, et... William X. Walsh
- Re: ICANN's Defective Competition Guidelines... jeff Williams
- Re: ICANN's Defective Competition Guidel... William X. Walsh
- Re: ICANN's Defective Competition G... jeff Williams
- Re: ICANN's Defective Competiti... William X. Walsh
- Re: ICANN's Defective Compe... jeff Williams
- Re: ICANN's Defective Compe... William X. Walsh
- [IFWP] Re: ICANN's Defectiv... Frank Rizzo
