Bill Lovell a écrit: > The "rules" on TM-DN issues are going to be made by the courts, which > have jurisdiction, and not by any of these alphabet soups, which do not. Haven't you read the WIPO report and the ICANN Accreditation Guidelines? The rules are being made right now, by ICANN. There won't be any more cases in court for judges to decide, simply because no more domain names will be given to people and organizations who aren't ready to trademark them. You can say what you wish, but the rules can be made by anyone with the power to restrict and restrain usage, whether they be multinational corporations, labor unions, or regulatory agencies like ICANN.
- [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Roeland M.J. Meyer
- list Re: Trademarks vs DNS Milton Mueller
- [IFWP] Re: list Re: Trademar... Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Re: list Re: Trad... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Re: list Re: Trad... Milton Mueller
- Re: [IFWP] Re: list Re: Trad... Gordon Cook
- Re: [IFWP] Re: list Re: Trad... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: list Re: Trad... Bill Lovell
- [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Roeland M.J. Meyer
- [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: Trademarks vs DNS Michael Sondow
- Re: Trademarks vs DNS Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: Trademarks vs DNS Bret A. Fausett
- RE: Trademarks vs DNS David Schutt
- [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: Trademarks vs DNS Roeland M.J. Meyer
- [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Bill Lovell