At 11:55 AM 2/15/99 -0800, you wrote: >At 11:27 AM 2/15/99 -0800, Bill Lovell wrote: >>At 02:49 AM 2/15/99 +00-04, you wrote: >>> >> >>> >>>As for *implementation, it seems like an ideal place to use XML. >>> >>What browsers/email packages now accommodate XML? > >Netscape and IE4 both do partial XML (different parts, of course). It is >generally still considered experimental. > Thanks. That was my understanding. Bill Lovell >
- [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Kerry Miller
- RE: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs ... Alex Kamantauskas
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs ... jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Roeland M.J. Meyer
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Einar Stefferud
- [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Kerry Miller
- [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Kerry Miller
- RE: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS William X. Walsh
- [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Kerry Miller
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS jeff Williams
- [IFWP] Re: Trademarks vs DNS Kerry Miller
