Einar Stefferud wrote:
+ By what measure is 3 days maximum elapsed time deemed sufficient to
+ obtain indepth and thoughtful comments (or suupport) from the global
+ Interent Community?
+
+ Sahdes of IAHC...  they at least allowed us to have a couple of weeks
+ before reading and ignoring our efforts.
+
+ But, I suppose this is called trust building, to be able to show NTIA
+ that they have waced their ideas under our noses and tht our responses
+ were to weak to bother with;-)...

 I respect your opinions Mr. Stefferud. But there
 is a time when mere opinionating is either a sign
 of true weakness or an indication of at least
 grudging support for that to which on is allegedly
 in opposition against. And there is a time, usually
 arising simultaneous to that, in which decisive
 action is called upon us all. Merely griping about
 ICANN is insufficient. I suggest moving our duffs
 off of those comfortable intellectual divans of ours
 and into some form of civilly disobedient activity
 to reverse the course of events. Or kindly allow
 others to do so and show them the decency of our
 support, fund raising abilities, etc.

 Towards this end... perhaps we should, as some have
 been saying all along, set to forming our own NEWCO,
 in our own image, regardless of what others attempt.
 We utilize this list as the founding convention and
 move, with speed, from there. What say you all? After
 all, authority is a matter of general confidence and,
 should we prove ourselves worthy, what more likely
 successor to Postel than others who uphold the best
 traditions and principles of not only the Net but also
 our various cultures in combination and synthesis.

 Bob Allisat

 Free Community Network _ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://fcn.net _ http://fcn.net/allisat
 http://robin.fcn.net

Reply via email to