At 2/25/99, 07:06 AM, Dan Steinberg wrote: >DRAFT CONFLICT OF INTEREST >* The draft Conflict-of-interest guidelines came out on the 17th of >February. >* there was no mention of a comment period deadline for it. >* even without the reminder, the document was only available for > (at most) 7 days, and this only for people who regularly check the >website. > >7 days to comment on something as fundamental as conflict-of-interest? Unless I'm mistaken, the ICANN Board can *not* approve this policy at the Singapore meeting because it was not posted for the required 30 day public comment period. Is that correct? Respectfully, Jay Fenello President, Iperdome, Inc.� 404-943-0524� http://www.iperdome.com
- [IFWP] ICANN comments deadline Molly Shaffer Van Houweling
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN comments deadline Bob Allisat
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN comments deadline Einar Stefferud
- [IFWP] IFWP: Founding Convention? Bob Allisat
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN comments deadline Dan Steinberg
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN comments deadlin... Molly Shaffer Van Houweling
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN comments dea... Dan Steinberg
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN comment... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN com... Dan Steinberg
- [IFWP] A slightl... Jay Fenello
- [IFWP] A slightl... Dan Steinberg
- Re: [IFWP] A sli... Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] A sli... Dan Steinberg
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN comment... Einar Stefferud
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN com... jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN com... Jay Fenello
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN comments deadline Jim Fleming
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN comments deadline Ellen Rony
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN comments deadline Joop Teernstra
- Re: [IFWP] ICANN comments deadlin... jeff Williams
