RE: [IFWP] RE: Privacy of Domain Registration Information

[Greg Skinner]

"David Schutt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> And I would consider that low cost place holder to be an improvement over
> the status-quo. It would give me a lot of the qualities that I'm looking
> for, but not all. I'd really like more flexibility in how I can make use of
> my entry in the tree. In your example, the only choice I have is to ask NSI
> to turn on my entry, and get Internet wide name resolution. Plus, only NSI
> is going to be providing service for that entry.

> If ICANN (or whomever <g>) can expand the utility of its offerings beyond
> the current application without degrading the existing arrangements, why
> not? A larger user base can decrease unit costs, not to mention the
> possibility of garnering a more diverse base of support by broadening the
> application from its current narrow focus.

Actually, I think these are good ideas, and prospective registrars might
want to consider them.

--gregbo