At 11:43 PM 3/12/99 +0000, Karl Auerbach wrote:
>In other words, you believe that the PSO is more important than the other
>PSOs.
>
>To be concise: Simple technical elitism.
>
>> > Which is, of course, patent nonesense.
Karl,
you are inventing meaning that does not exist in the statements made and
for which there is no indication of intention or meaning held.
You are persisting in pursuing a topic that is not in general debate,
namely the number and allocation of SO slots. It's fine that you are
unhappy with the current plan, but it's not fine to insist on pursuing the
matter long after it is resolved. To the extent that you think it is still
a pending issue, then where is the rough consensus in support of your view?
If the IETF Poisson work is so terrible, then pursue an alternative proposal.
There are constructive matters to discuss in the realm of SO's, in general,
and the PSO in particular. Surely we should spend our time on such
matters, instead.
d/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dave Crocker Tel: +1 408 246 8253
Brandenburg Consulting Fax: +1 408 273 6464
675 Spruce Drive <http://www.brandenburg.com>
Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
