On 17-Mar-99 Ellen Rony wrote:
> Jay Fenello wrote:
>
> >According to your scenario, the excluded parties should simply
> >organize (i.e. .per.nu, .com.au, etc.) and form a constituency
> >of our own. Then, we would get three appointments to the Name
> >Council, instead of having to share with the rest of the ccTLDs.
>
> I can see it now - a Names Council as large as this mailing list!
> 21 members and growing by threes...
>
DSO is about to launch 2 new third level domain services under two domains we
recently acquired. I know of at least 4 other such services already in
operation (two of which are free, like DSO's services will be). One has over
10K registered domains within less then 3 weeks with nothing but word of mouth.
I know of at least 6 others under development.
So how about a 3rd level NON-ccTLD related registry operators' constituency?
I know the directors of all of these services and they would easily organize
(and work together better than some of these consituencies appear to be).
By what basis would ICANN deny them recognition?
----------------------------------
E-Mail: William X. Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 16-Mar-99
Time: 23:34:27
----------------------------------
"We may well be on our way to a society overrun by hordes
of lawyers, hungry as locusts."
- Chief Justice Warren Burger, US Supreme Court, 1977
