Kent and all,
Do you realize how inane you sound here Kent? If not, you should.
Kent Crispin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 1999 at 01:05:27PM -0500, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
> > At 09:36 AM 1/12/99 -0800, Kent Crispin wrote:
> > >
> > >Ms Burr:
> > >
> > >I must protest this proposed teleconference (see below) with "ORSC
> > >folks". This is a matter some importance, and of wide interest to
> > >many people. Privileged, closed access for the ORSC is simply not
> > >fair to all these other interested parties, and is in fact completely
> > >at odds with the values that ORSC claims to hold.
> > >
> > >Thanks for your attention.
> > >
> > >Kent Crispin
> >
> > What are we supposed to do Kent? Becky offered to call us.
>
> Note that I addressed the letter to her.
>
> > We don't talk to anbody without ex partate rules; if Becky is
> > not cool with that we won't talk to her.
>
> I look forward to a timely transcript of the call, then. However,
> given the speed with which events transpire, the transcript would
> have to be available almost immediately to be of value in this
> discussion.
>
> > This has not
> > been a problem so far, nor do I personally think it
> > will be in the future.
>
> You miss the point.
>
> The problem (and it is a *real* problem) is that ORSC is getting
> privileged access to NTIA. There have been no such offers to POC, or
> DNSO, or CORE, or IFWP, or INTA, or anyone else. Now, perhaps you
> are suggesting that anyone from one of those groups, or other groups,
> can email Ms Burr, and thus get a conference call arranged. I don't
> think that is what Ms Burr wants to do, however. If it is, I'm sure
> that David Maher, Ken Stubbs, and a large set of others will be
> quite interested in such calls. We would all like private briefings
> as to what is going on in NTIA, and we would have no problem with ex
> parte rules, either.
>
> > If you have a problem with that perhaps you can suggest
> > another way for ORSC to talk to DoC; no resonable
> > suggestion will be overlooked. Note that "you shouldn't
> > be talking to DoC" is probably the wrong answer.
>
> The for sure right answer is that ORSC should be treated like
> everyone else. That probably means that ORSC should not be talking
> to DoC.
>
> --
> Kent Crispin, PAB Chair "Do good, and you'll be
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] lonesome." -- Mark Twain
>
> __________________________________________________
> To receive the digest version instead, send a
> blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ___END____________________________________________
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
