Roberto and all,
Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> Ellen,
>
> You wrote:
>
> > In light of the past few days of comments, let's just shine a mirror on
> > your message, with a few words replaced (see caps)
> >
> > I must protest this proposed JANUARY 21 MEETING with DNSO.ORG "SPONSORS
> > AND
> > INVITEES". This is a matter some importance, and of wide interest to
> > many people. Privileged, closed access for the DNSO.ORG SPONSORS is
> > simply not
> > fair to all these other interested parties, and is in fact completely
> > at odds with the values that DNSO claims to hold.
> >
> I agree, with one caveat.
>
> The January 21 meeting is not with DNSO.ORG "Sponsors and Invitees", but
> with ITAA "Sponsors and Invitees" (see
> http://www.itaa.org/ecomm/calpro/idncinv.htm).
>
> Because of the very fact that we (DNSO.ORG) believe that "Privileged, closed
> access for the DNSO.ORG [in fact, ITAA] SPONSORS is simply not fair to all
> these other interested parties, and is in fact completely at odds with the
> values that DNSO claims to hold", as you rightfully say, we tried all what
> was in our power to make the meeting more representative as possible of all
> constituencies.
This is pure hogwash Roberto and you know well that it is! I admire
your attempt to shift attention away from the DIRECT involvement
of DNSO.ORG in organizing this meeting as a damage control
procedure, but the cat is our of the bag already, and such attempts
will not at this juncture be believed.
>
>
> As you may know, CORE (one of the evil "invitees") proposed to ORSC to
> participate to that meeting using a seat otherwise allocated to CORE by the
> organizers. Analogous actions are being taken right now by other "invitees"
> (I know because I contacted a couple personally), so that at the end we may
> have a good part of the Internet represented.
> It's not perfect, but it's better than before.
And this comment here of yours Roberto confirms the FACT that the
DNSO.ORG is directly involved with this closed and secret, by invite
only January 21st meeting. Nice try, but no cigar!!!
>
>
> What you state is a concern that DNSO.ORG has, but our line of action is to
> act positively to overcome or at least reduce the shortcomings rather than
> complaining about (I am not at all suggesting that you do, I am speaking
> generally here).
Well GENERALLY speaking, the best thing for the DNSO.ORG to do at this
point is to publicly announce that it does not nor will it ever in any way
participate in any meeting of this nature. However, somehow I very much
doubt that DNSO.ORG will make such an announcement...
>
>
> Always nice to talk to you.
> Roberto
>
> __________________________________________________
> To receive the digest version instead, send a
> blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ___END____________________________________________
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
