At 01:48 PM 1/13/99 +0100, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
>
>I trust ORSC.
>I believe that they will do whatever is in their power to provide feedback
>to the Internet Community about their conversation. If they can provide
>transcripts in timely manner, they will do. This is not the point either.
>
>OTOH, I would like to focus on the reason why Stef has started to raise the
>issue to USG, because this is, from my point of view, where a fruitful
>exchange of opinions can take place on these lists.
>
>If I understand correctly the document
>(http://www.nist.gov/admin/od/contract/9c1020.htm), USG is proceeding to a
>next step towards recognition of ICANN and transfer of power to it, i.e. the
>process that started with the signature of the MoU between US DoC and ICANN
>(http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/icann-memorandum.htm).
>
>Why is USG doing it, and why is Stef, or ORSC, objecting to it, is the
>interesting subject of discussion, IMHO.
It went roughly like this:
1) Jim Fleming sent me the URL of the announcement.
2) I sent it to Stef and Steinberg say "what is this?"
3) They emailed Becky and said "what is this?"
4) Becky said "I'll call you"
I don't think we're objecting; we wanna hear what it means.
Thats ok, right ?
--
"We will create a civilization of the Mind in Cyberspace. May it be more
humane and fair than the world your governments have made before." - Barlow.
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
