On 13-Jan-99 jeff Williams wrote:
> William and all,
>
> I have on more than one occasion done this publicly and as well
> made official filings as than so indicated. Please review archives
> or relevant lists for further information in case you have forgotten.
>
I once again checked my archives to verify your claim above.
It is false.
All that I was able to locate on this subject was a flat out refusal to do so
unless some other conspiracy you claimed as going on at the time disclosed who
they were working for.
To rephrase, you have never made this public disclosure on any of the relevent
domain policy discussion lists. Not once, not ever.
My original comment then still stands, and I paste it here below for you to try
and respond to again, please.
On 13-Jan-99 jeff Williams wrote:
> If so Dr. Lisse, than I demand a position on the Drafting team as well
> as I represent a large group. If not granted than the process which
> the DNSO.ORG is engaging in is by definition divisive, improper, and
> a form of gerrymandering.
This type of claim requires that one divulge who they are representing. If you
are not able, or willing, to do that, your request cannot be taken seriously,
or given any additional weight as a result of your claimed representation.
----------------------------------
E-Mail: William X. Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 13-Jan-99
Time: 10:23:51
----------------------------------
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
