William and all,
William X. Walsh wrote:
> On 13-Jan-99 jeff Williams wrote:
> > William and all,
> >
> > William X. Walsh wrote:
> >
> >> On 13-Jan-99 jeff Williams wrote:
> >> > William and all,
> >> >
> >> > I have on more than one occasion done this publicly and as well
> >> > made official filings as than so indicated. Please review archives
> >> > or relevant lists for further information in case you have forgotten.
> >> >
> >>
> >> I once again checked my archives to verify your claim above.
> >>
> >> It is false.
> >
> > No it is not. I just had one of folks do some checking and it is just
> > as I indicated.
>
> Please post references then. I have all of these lists archived, and I cannot
> locate it, neither can others on these lists. Post references to such a list,
> or stop making false claims.
No William and anyone else, I am not going to continue to do YOUR research
for you. If you are unable to do it yourself or cannot afford to hire someone
to do it for you than I suppose you are SOL. I have posted this information
more time than I can remember. And I explicitly said the last time that I
would not do so again for your convince or edification, as you are capable
enough to do this for yourself. If not or you do not wish to take the time
to do so, than again you are SOL.
>
>
> > BTW how are thing going on that FRAUD charge with the .TJ
> > ccTLD registry. I am on the IANA announce list and have heard nothing
> > regarding you prior claims. Care to enlighten us all William?
>
> LOL - Nice attempt to turn this around. I notice you support me on this issue
> when I post something in support of a position you hold, and attack me with it
> when I post something contrary about you. :) Nice personal attack, and no, it
> really does not bother me that you post this.
You misread my meaning here William. I am not attacking you at all.
I DO support your claim. That simple. I was wondering what the progress
might be. If you don't know than just say so. Sheeeesh! Your level of
paranoia is really bad William! Take a valium will ya!
>
>
> Firther, you know perfectly well, and it has been posted on this list, that
> there was no fraud, and exactly what the issues are.
Others claim otherwise, as you well know. Somewhere is the truth. I
tend to believe your story. However it is just YOUR story after all. So
as a matter of an object lesson and support for your story at the same time,
I ask again at this time. Do you now see the correlation?
>
>
> However, there are some new developments in the few days, and expect a post
> publicly from me about this later this week.
Great! Look forward to reading it. >;)
>
>
> >>
> >>
> >> All that I was able to locate on this subject was a flat out refusal to do
> >> so
> >> unless some other conspiracy you claimed as going on at the time disclosed
> >> who
> >> they were working for.
> >
> > Whom is the "THEY" you are referring to?
>
> Joe Sims and his firm for one.
>
> >>
> >>
> >> To rephrase, you have never made this public disclosure on any of the
> >> relevent
> >> domain policy discussion lists. Not once, not ever.
> >
> > Many many times on Domain-policy list and the IAHC-discuss list,
> > as well as the gTLD-MoU list.
>
> Post references or stop making false claims. I've search these lists and quite
> simply your posts are not there.
As I said above, I have done this on many occasions to the point of
nausium. And the last time I did so, I said emphatically that I would not
do so again. Find them yourself, or you are SOL. If you cannot find them
yourself than you can hire someone to do it for your or again you
are SOL. I AM NOT YOUR RESEARCH ASSISTANT!
>
>
> >>
> >>
> >> My original comment then still stands, and I paste it here below for you to
> >> try
> >> and respond to again, please.
> >>
> >> On 13-Jan-99 jeff Williams wrote:
> >> > If so Dr. Lisse, than I demand a position on the Drafting team as well
> >> > as I represent a large group. If not granted than the process which
> >> > the DNSO.ORG is engaging in is by definition divisive, improper, and
> >> > a form of gerrymandering.
> >>
> >> This type of claim requires that one divulge who they are representing. If
> >> you
> >> are not able, or willing, to do that, your request cannot be taken
> >> seriously,
> >> or given any additional weight as a result of your claimed representation.
> >
> > "THEY"? Whom is this "THEY" that you are referring to again William!?
> > "I" am spokesman for INEGroup. And again see:
> > http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/proposals/ineginc/ineginc.htm
> > For further details!!!!
>
> Oh yes Jeff. The infamous INEG proposal to NTIA. Just because they accepted
> your proposal does NOT mean that they accept your claims or provide and
> legitimacy to your claims. And you continued efforts to use this as a claim of
> legitimacy just shows how flimsy your foundation is in this area.
You may also wish to check the archives of the comments area a well
and look for the post Becky Burr sent us to my E-Mail address. Now,
there is another hint for you. Get cracking! And BTW I also posted that
to the IFWP list as I recall.
>
>
> Your house of cards is falling, Jeff.
No you are acting foolishly William! Grow up and get a grip.
>
>
> Also, it should be pointed out that just because you CLAIM you have answered a
> question in the past is no reason not to post an answer to it again, especially
> since none of the other participants on these lists are able to locate this
> posts you allege you made.
Well two of my people didn't have too much problem finding it. <Shrug>
>
>
> All it takes is one post to put this to rest. That you are not willing to make
> that post says more than anything I can say here about you.
And I have made that post several times. You will just ask this same
question or make this same request again in about two or three weeks
again and state it the same way William. You have already done it twice
as I recall.
Like I say to my two girls, I will tell you thre times, and on the forth time
you are out of luck (SOL) for you adults. If you need to be told and shown
more than three times, which I have done, than you have some serious
learning or memory disorder. See a doctor.
>
>
> ----------------------------------
> E-Mail: William X. Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 13-Jan-99
> Time: 11:09:46
> ----------------------------------
>
> __________________________________________________
> To receive the digest version instead, send a
> blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ___END____________________________________________
Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Contact Number: 972-447-1894
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
