On 13-Jan-99 jeff Williams wrote:
> William and all,
>
> William X. Walsh wrote:
>
>> On 13-Jan-99 jeff Williams wrote:
>> > William and all,
>> >
>> > I have on more than one occasion done this publicly and as well
>> > made official filings as than so indicated. Please review archives
>> > or relevant lists for further information in case you have forgotten.
>> >
>>
>> I once again checked my archives to verify your claim above.
>>
>> It is false.
>
> No it is not. I just had one of folks do some checking and it is just
> as I indicated.
Please post references then. I have all of these lists archived, and I cannot
locate it, neither can others on these lists. Post references to such a list,
or stop making false claims.
> BTW how are thing going on that FRAUD charge with the .TJ
> ccTLD registry. I am on the IANA announce list and have heard nothing
> regarding you prior claims. Care to enlighten us all William?
LOL - Nice attempt to turn this around. I notice you support me on this issue
when I post something in support of a position you hold, and attack me with it
when I post something contrary about you. :) Nice personal attack, and no, it
really does not bother me that you post this.
Firther, you know perfectly well, and it has been posted on this list, that
there was no fraud, and exactly what the issues are.
However, there are some new developments in the few days, and expect a post
publicly from me about this later this week.
>>
>>
>> All that I was able to locate on this subject was a flat out refusal to do
>> so
>> unless some other conspiracy you claimed as going on at the time disclosed
>> who
>> they were working for.
>
> Whom is the "THEY" you are referring to?
Joe Sims and his firm for one.
>>
>>
>> To rephrase, you have never made this public disclosure on any of the
>> relevent
>> domain policy discussion lists. Not once, not ever.
>
> Many many times on Domain-policy list and the IAHC-discuss list,
> as well as the gTLD-MoU list.
Post references or stop making false claims. I've search these lists and quite
simply your posts are not there.
>>
>>
>> My original comment then still stands, and I paste it here below for you to
>> try
>> and respond to again, please.
>>
>> On 13-Jan-99 jeff Williams wrote:
>> > If so Dr. Lisse, than I demand a position on the Drafting team as well
>> > as I represent a large group. If not granted than the process which
>> > the DNSO.ORG is engaging in is by definition divisive, improper, and
>> > a form of gerrymandering.
>>
>> This type of claim requires that one divulge who they are representing. If
>> you
>> are not able, or willing, to do that, your request cannot be taken
>> seriously,
>> or given any additional weight as a result of your claimed representation.
>
> "THEY"? Whom is this "THEY" that you are referring to again William!?
> "I" am spokesman for INEGroup. And again see:
> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/proposals/ineginc/ineginc.htm
> For further details!!!!
Oh yes Jeff. The infamous INEG proposal to NTIA. Just because they accepted
your proposal does NOT mean that they accept your claims or provide and
legitimacy to your claims. And you continued efforts to use this as a claim of
legitimacy just shows how flimsy your foundation is in this area.
Your house of cards is falling, Jeff.
Also, it should be pointed out that just because you CLAIM you have answered a
question in the past is no reason not to post an answer to it again, especially
since none of the other participants on these lists are able to locate this
posts you allege you made.
All it takes is one post to put this to rest. That you are not willing to make
that post says more than anything I can say here about you.
----------------------------------
E-Mail: William X. Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 13-Jan-99
Time: 11:09:46
----------------------------------
__________________________________________________
To receive the digest version instead, send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To SUBSCRIBE forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To UNSUBSCRIBE, forward this message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems/suggestions regarding this list? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___END____________________________________________
