In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, William X. Walsh writes:
>
> Am I the only domain holder here that find this clause absolutely
> unacceptable?
>
>
> On Sun, 25 Apr 1999 07:15:59 -0400, "A.M. Rutkowski"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >This standard indemnification provision applies to the
> >Second Level Domain registrants vis-a-vis NSIRegistry.Net.
> >It simply says that if the SLD does something that results
> >in NSIRegistry.net getting dragged as a third party into
> >litigation as a result of the SLD's action, that SLD will pay
> >NSIRegistry.net's related costs. It is entirely reasonable
> >and appropriate, and I expect that every registrar will
> >have a similar provision regarding themselves and SLD
> >registrants.
William,
when will you finally stop your whining?
This is a standard clause that most Registries have in their
agreement.
el
