Dr. Lisse,
That is not the case at all. Having some experience in this matter
and having dealt with a number of existing registries, I can say that
your statement below is absolutely false. Perhaps the learned Doctor
should do some research before being quite so flippant.
On Sun, 25 Apr 1999 14:50:54 +0100, Dr Eberhard W Lisse
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, William X. Walsh writes:
>>
>> Am I the only domain holder here that find this clause absolutely
>> unacceptable?
>>
>>
>> On Sun, 25 Apr 1999 07:15:59 -0400, "A.M. Rutkowski"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >This standard indemnification provision applies to the
>> >Second Level Domain registrants vis-a-vis NSIRegistry.Net.
>> >It simply says that if the SLD does something that results
>> >in NSIRegistry.net getting dragged as a third party into
>> >litigation as a result of the SLD's action, that SLD will pay
>> >NSIRegistry.net's related costs. It is entirely reasonable
>> >and appropriate, and I expect that every registrar will
>> >have a similar provision regarding themselves and SLD
>> >registrants.
>
>William,
>
>when will you finally stop your whining?
>
>This is a standard clause that most Registries have in their
>agreement.
>
>el
--
William X. Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
General Manager, DSo Internet Services
NSI & Internic news http://www.dso.net/internic/
