Ummmmmmm...
No.
But read your previous domregs. The old ones weren't that much
better. This is a case of scope creep applied to contracts. Who says
software engineers get to have all the fun? <g>.
"William X. Walsh" wrote:
>
> Am I the only domain holder here that find this clause absolutely
> unacceptable?
>
> On Sun, 25 Apr 1999 07:15:59 -0400, "A.M. Rutkowski"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >This standard indemnification provision applies to the
> >Second Level Domain registrants vis-a-vis NSIRegistry.Net.
> >It simply says that if the SLD does something that results
> >in NSIRegistry.net getting dragged as a third party into
> >litigation as a result of the SLD's action, that SLD will pay
> >NSIRegistry.net's related costs. It is entirely reasonable
> >and appropriate, and I expect that every registrar will
> >have a similar provision regarding themselves and SLD
> >registrants.
> >
> >
> >
> >--tony
>
> --
> William X. Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> General Manager, DSo Internet Services
>
> NSI & Internic news http://www.dso.net/internic/
--
Dan Steinberg
SYNTHESIS:Law & Technology
35, du Ravin
Box 532, RR1 phone: (613) 794-5356
Chelsea, Quebec fax: (819) 827-4398
J0X 1N0 e-mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
