> So, somewhere down the line, it is going to be required that these two
> candidate constituencies get together to form one out of both, or for
> one to kill the other off.
Why not let 'em both exist and fight for mind share?
This only demonstrates the overall sillyness of constituencies.
The only solution is to let people form aggregations as they see fit,
and change them as they see fit, but to give all voting or appointive
powers to the individuals and none to the aggregations themselves.
--karl--
- [IFWP] Announcement of the new TLD Association (TLDA) Einar Stefferud
- Re: [IFWP] Announcement of the new TLD Associatio... A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] Announcement of the new TLD Associ... A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] Announcement of the new TLD Associatio... Karl Auerbach
- Re: [IFWP] Announcement of the new TLD Associ... Jeff Williams
- RE: [IFWP] Announcement of the new TLD Associatio... Marsh, Miles (Gene)
- RE: [IFWP] Announcement of the new TLD Associatio... Marsh, Miles (Gene)
- Re: [IFWP] Announcement of the new TLD Associatio... Ellen Rony
- RE: [IFWP] Announcement of the new TLD Associatio... Ellen Rony
- Re: [IFWP] Announcement of the new TLD Associatio... Richard J. Sexton
- RE: [IFWP] Announcement of the new TLD Associatio... Marsh, Miles (Gene)
- RE: [IFWP] Announcement of the new TLD Associatio... Marsh, Miles (Gene)
- Fwd: Re: [IFWP] Announcement of the new TLD Assoc... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] Announcement of the new TLD Associatio... Jeff Williams
