In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > >Being a TLD administrator, you know as well as I do that the info in > > >the SOA record isn't always correct, and postmaster@ addresses don't > > >always work. > > > > The whois information isn't always correct either. > > I agree. But I'd much rather trust information that *I* (as a TLD admin) > maintain, than SOA records that the individual domain administrators > *sometimes* maintain. But what does the question of what you (and I) like h ave to do with whether this is intellectual property or whether it forms part of the contract NSI had with DOJ? Which are two separate issues, by the way. el
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investiga... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Martin B. Schwimmer
- RE: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Marsh, Miles (Gene)
- [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Kerry Miller
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Teddy A. Purwadi
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI sthaug
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Martin B. Schwimmer
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI A.M. Rutkowski
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] Re: DOJ investigating NSI Jeff Williams
