[IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondow

[Roberto Gaetano]

Eberhard,

You wrote:

> The way I read the notes Mr Simms said under oath (in front of a
> Congressional Committee) he didn't do it, whereas he later said he
> did it.
> 
As I said before, the "it" in the first part of the sentence is a different
thing of the "it" in the second part. Joe did "one thing" and didn't do
"another thing".

> That would seem to me to be perjury. Which used to be a crime.
> 
I am not a lawyer, but from what I have read recently the concept of perjury
in the US is rather flexible... ;>)

Back to the serious side of your statement, if somebody among the many
recipients of this thread is convinced that Joe Sims committed perjury,
there's only one thing to do: take him to court.

Best regards
Roberto