On Fri, 21 May 1999, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> Eberhard,
>
> You wrote:
>
> > The way I read the notes Mr Simms said under oath (in front of a
> > Congressional Committee) he didn't do it, whereas he later said he
> > did it.
> >
> As I said before, the "it" in the first part of the sentence is a different
> thing of the "it" in the second part. Joe did "one thing" and didn't do
> "another thing".
That depends on what the meaningot *IT* is :-)-O
> > That would seem to me to be perjury. Which used to be a crime.
> >
> I am not a lawyer, but from what I have read recently the concept of perjury
> in the US is rather flexible... ;>)
There you go :-)-O
> Back to the serious side of your statement, if somebody among the many
> recipients of this thread is convinced that Joe Sims committed perjury,
> there's only one thing to do: take him to court.
It's my understanding that only the Committee can do that.
el
--
Dr. Eberhard W. Lisse\ / Swakopmund State Hospital
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * | Resident Medical Officer
Private Bag 5004 \ / +264 81 1246733 (c) 64 461005(h) 461004(f)
Swakopmund, Namibia ;____/ Domain Coordinator for NA-DOM (el108)
