Greg, In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Greg Skinner writes: > If this is the case, this is bad for the IFWP process (and email in > particular as a step towards participatory online Internet > governance), if it actually could have had more of an impact on > ICANN. The IFWP process was dead long before Willie started to whine. el
- [IFWP] Re: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondow Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- [IFWP] Re: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondow Ellen Rony
- [IFWP] Re: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondow Kent Crispin
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Duplicity by Fenello and S... Karl Auerbach
- [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondow Roberto Gaetano
- [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondow Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondo... Michael Sondow
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondow Richard J. Sexton
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondo... Greg Skinner
- [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondo... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondow Esther Dyson
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondo... Frank Rizzo
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and S... Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello a... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello a... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondo... Jay Fenello
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and S... Dave Crocker
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello a... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondo... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and S... Bill Lovell
