In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]@esther>, Esther Dyson writes: > For the record, Joe was talking about two different things. But why > does all this matter so much anyway? who phoned whom, etc. etc. It doesn't matter at all, you are quite right. What DOES matter is that he seems to have stated under oath, in fornt of a Congressional Committe something which he later stated wasn't true. That's perjury, by an officer of the court, no less. But then that does confirm my opinion of the second oldest profession in the world. el
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondow Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondo... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondow Esther Dyson
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondow Frank Rizzo
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondo... Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and S... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and S... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondow Jay Fenello
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondo... Dave Crocker
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and S... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondow Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondo... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and S... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello a... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fene... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondow Richard J. Sexton
- [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondow Gordon Cook
