At 09:44 AM 5/22/99 +0100, you wrote: >In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]@esther>, Esther >Dyson writes: > >> For the record, Joe was talking about two different things. But why >> does all this matter so much anyway? who phoned whom, etc. etc. > >It doesn't matter at all, you are quite right. What DOES matter is >that he seems to have stated under oath, in fornt of a Congressional >Committe something which he later stated wasn't true. > >That's perjury, by an officer of the court, no less. > >But then that does confirm my opinion of the second oldest profession >in the world. > Hey, Dr. Lisse: Stuff it. Dr. Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] Re: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondo... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondow Esther Dyson
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondow Frank Rizzo
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondo... Greg Skinner
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and S... Jeff Williams
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and S... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondow Jay Fenello
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondo... Dave Crocker
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and S... William X. Walsh
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondow Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondo... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and S... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello a... Bill Lovell
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fene... Dr Eberhard W Lisse
- Re: [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondow Richard J. Sexton
- [IFWP] RE: Duplicity by Fenello and Sondow Gordon Cook
