> In fact, we recognize the authority of ICANN, and we assume that, as there > are accredited Registrars, there will be accredited Registries, and gTLDs > will be allocated to these (accredited) Registries following a method to be > determined. > I assume that the DNSO will provide a recommendation in this sense. In fact, > a working group on new gTLDs is already being formed. A group for which I, as a representative of the longest-standing prospective registry, was told, at first, that my "application" would be considered, and then that my contribution was not necessary. The DNSO is a captured entity, whos results as passed on to ICANN will be as predictable as the outcome of the IAHC process. And as similar. Christopher
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- RE: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- RE: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- RE: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- RE: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
- Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge. Anonymous
