Christopher,
Am I understanding correctly, and you mean that you have been refused the
possibility to join DNSO Working Group C on new gTLDs?
If so, by whom and on which basis?
Regards
Roberto
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Christopher Ambler [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 1999 6:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [IFWP] Rise up to the challenge.
>
> > In fact, we recognize the authority of ICANN, and we assume that, as
> there
> > are accredited Registrars, there will be accredited Registries, and
> gTLDs
> > will be allocated to these (accredited) Registries following a method to
> be
> > determined.
> > I assume that the DNSO will provide a recommendation in this sense. In
> fact,
> > a working group on new gTLDs is already being formed.
>
> A group for which I, as a representative of the longest-standing
> prospective
> registry, was told, at first, that my "application" would be considered,
> and
> then that my contribution was not necessary.
>
> The DNSO is a captured entity, whos results as passed on to ICANN will
> be as predictable as the outcome of the IAHC process. And as similar.
>
> Christopher
