On Mon, 5 Jul 1999 14:24:30 -0400, Gordon Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

>Michael, *PLEASE* get a hold of yourself......  It looked to me like all he
>was doing was saying that the ilk of POC, PAB, CORE and the MOUvement had
>found some t echnical language in the way their organization was set up now
>so that the involvement of umpty nine "mou"ies did not violate the icann by
>laws...
>

Gordon, you act like this is unusual behavior for Michael.  Far from
it, it is the rule with him.


>
>
>>Patrick Greenwell a �crit:
>>>
>>> Doubtlessly you'll scream at me for not agreeing with your assesment.
>>
>>I sceram at no one. But are you content, then, that the NC is in the
>>hands of CORE (and ISOC)? Is this, according to you, the fulfillment
>>of the White Paper's call for self-organization by all stakeholders?
>>
>>Are you helping here to justify CORE and ISOC's takeover of the DNSO
>>because it keeps users like me out, which you seem to be in
>>agreement with, since you have insulted and rejected and aggressed
>>against us ever since we dared to intervene on these lists and in
>>the NewCo, despite the fact that the White Paper and the DOC have
>>stated that the DNSO should be divided equally between users and
>>operators? I guess that, for you, capture of ICANN by CORE and ISOC,
>>so long as it excludes the users, is the lesser of two evils. At
>>least, that's what you seem to be saying.
>
>****************************************************************
>The COOK Report on Internet            Index to seven years of the COOK Report
>431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA  Exec summaries, glossary etc
>(609) 882-2572 (phone & fax)           http://cookreport.com
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]                    What's Behind ICANN and How it Will
>Impact the Future of the Internet http://cookreport.com/icannregulate.shtml
>****************************************************************


--
William X. Walsh
General Manager, DSo Internet Services
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  Fax:(209) 671-7934

"The fact is that domain names are new and have unique
characteristics, and their status under the law is not yet clear." 
--Kent Crispin (June 29th, 1999)

Reply via email to