Michael, *PLEASE* get a hold of yourself...... It looked to me like all he
was doing was saying that the ilk of POC, PAB, CORE and the MOUvement had
found some t echnical language in the way their organization was set up now
so that the involvement of umpty nine "mou"ies did not violate the icann by
laws...
>Patrick Greenwell a �crit:
>>
>> Doubtlessly you'll scream at me for not agreeing with your assesment.
>
>I sceram at no one. But are you content, then, that the NC is in the
>hands of CORE (and ISOC)? Is this, according to you, the fulfillment
>of the White Paper's call for self-organization by all stakeholders?
>
>Are you helping here to justify CORE and ISOC's takeover of the DNSO
>because it keeps users like me out, which you seem to be in
>agreement with, since you have insulted and rejected and aggressed
>against us ever since we dared to intervene on these lists and in
>the NewCo, despite the fact that the White Paper and the DOC have
>stated that the DNSO should be divided equally between users and
>operators? I guess that, for you, capture of ICANN by CORE and ISOC,
>so long as it excludes the users, is the lesser of two evils. At
>least, that's what you seem to be saying.
****************************************************************
The COOK Report on Internet Index to seven years of the COOK Report
431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA Exec summaries, glossary etc
(609) 882-2572 (phone & fax) http://cookreport.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED] What's Behind ICANN and How it Will
Impact the Future of the Internet http://cookreport.com/icannregulate.shtml
****************************************************************
